Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed

Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed

Blog Article

Your session is going to timeout on account of inactivity. Simply click OK to increase your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.

They can be a similar factor, but H4831 sc is Minimize shorter so it's going to pack right into a scenario a lot easier then the normal, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it permits us to add much more powder then just the normal H4831.

It's probably that no even further dialogue is required, through which case we suggest starting off a different thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your reaction is necessary you could still achieve this.

Warning using SC or SSC designed loads with prolonged cut, back again off and do the job up. Use Protected loading procedures.

Beginner to reloading. This will likely be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be ready to get my fingers on a few lbs . of h4831.

I understand, tough moments. H4831SC will certainly function, I just did not like the situation density when loaded lengthy. I do not recall powder charge off the top of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps and that is where I generally aim being. Within your situation making use of what you've got (and what I must have completed) I'd start with the end of the bearing surface of the bullet right at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you find a velocity node.

I am using it by using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as accurate. RL22 did properly but I had been somewhat concerned about temp stability. I believe I'm at seventy two grains and have about 2850ish fps

Although this is most likely true, there's a good deal far more to it than simply not blowing you up. He couldn't hit prairie canines over and above about one hundred fifty yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't executing anything at all h4831sc load data favorable for his grouping potential with All those loads.

You could both: 1) Carry on and have the firearm(s) listed down below quickly faraway from your buying cart:

locutus mentioned: I still have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which h4831sc load data flows by my powder measures effortlessly.

I have had related experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders is not going to shoot nicely with nearly anything apart from Fed215's. Some elements just Will not Participate in effectively with other. Appears like you've got chosen 3 very good powders, I'd personally expect at the very least one of these to shoot.

The "SC" stands for Brief Lower. I have not seen a difference between either powder dut I don't Believe I would blend them.

arkansas or ohio i hardly ever recognized a variation aside from the normal is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.

I sawed one h4831 vs h4831sc particular in 50 percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, and so they have been very easily twice as thick as being a 50-grain hollow issue was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Electricity Level, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every thing I know about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know something whatsoever about the 223. I question that you're going to get anyplace with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.